(no subject)

Date: 2020-09-14 04:13 am (UTC)
raine: (Default)
From: [personal profile] raine
From what I've read, they started replacing the local interpreters with soldiers because they couldn't guarantee safety of the interpreters' families and the risk of exposure was deemed too high. A soldier who's an interpreter is trained to kill - a local interpreter usually isn't. It's now considered a last-resort sort of measure to use someone local to interpret. (The US evacuated a lot of the people they used as local interpreters for safety/military protocol reasons after the first Iraq War. Not sure if any other of the coalition countries did the same.)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org